<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Apple Briefs &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applebriefs.com/category/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applebriefs.com</link>
	<description>A guide to improving your law firm or small business with Macintosh computers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:13:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New iPod Shuffles, That Talk!</title>
		<link>http://www.applebriefs.com/2009/03/11/new-ipod-shuffles-that-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.applebriefs.com/2009/03/11/new-ipod-shuffles-that-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Kabbe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applebriefs.com/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple released new iPod Shuffles today. They&#8217;re tiny. And they also talk. I admit that I was wrong about whether Apple would implement such a feature. Apple sidestepped the need to add hardware (other than a button) to the shuffle by generating the voiceover on your Mac (one of those, *smack head*, &#8220;I should have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple released new iPod Shuffles today.  They&#8217;re tiny.  And they also <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/voiceover.html">talk</a>.  I admit that I was <a href="http://www.applebriefs.com/2009/02/28/i-can-name-that-tune-in/">wrong</a> about whether Apple would implement such a feature.</p>
<p>Apple sidestepped the need to add hardware (other than a button) to the shuffle by generating the voiceover on your Mac (one of those, *smack head*, &#8220;I should have thought of that&#8221; moments).  I still can&#8217;t see the benefit of speaking the song name.  Maybe other people just aren&#8217;t as into their music as I am.  On the other hand, if you&#8217;re going to add playlists and speak the playlist name, you might as well go all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.applebriefs.com/2009/03/11/new-ipod-shuffles-that-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I can name that tune in&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.applebriefs.com/2009/02/28/i-can-name-that-tune-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.applebriefs.com/2009/02/28/i-can-name-that-tune-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 03:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Kabbe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applebriefs.com/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Gruber over at Daring Fireball wrote a piece today asking for text-to-speech capability on the iPod Shuffle. John&#8217;s usually pretty insightful, but I have to disagree with him today. For most avid music listeners, I think this would work better in theory than in practice. Reading the artist and song name would take at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Gruber over at Daring Fireball wrote a piece today asking for <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2009/02/lost_in_the_shuffle">text-to-speech capability on the iPod Shuffle</a>.  John&#8217;s usually pretty insightful, but I have to disagree with him today.  For most avid music listeners, I think this would work better in theory than in practice.  Reading the artist and song name would take at least 3 or 4 seconds.  In that time, I could have been listening to the song and probably have identified which song it was.  Text-to speech is needed on the Nano because the Nano has text menus.  The Shuffle is an entirely different animal.  And Apple isn&#8217;t likely to &#8220;improve&#8221; that animal with a feature that adds cost and which most people will want to turn off anyway.</p>
<p>ps. I tried desperately to find a way to make this law-related, but I just couldn&#8217;t.  I&#8217;m sorry, and I apologize for the distraction!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.applebriefs.com/2009/02/28/i-can-name-that-tune-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

